Find a Lawyer

AHMED HASSAN versus STATE

Articles 2?2 (b), 7 i7l (ii), 7 337a (ii) and 34 34 Definition of Evidence In this case neither party came in handy and deliberately witnessed both incidents. That was hidden from reality. During the submission to the trial court, the injuries received by the opposing party were not explained, but it was difficult to ascertain the facts available on record which ignited the whole matter and The crime originated in the search for the mysterious investigating officer. It was a case of free war between the parties in which both parties used weapons and injured their opponents. The Trade Court, in such cases, correctly observed that none of the parties. There was no other option and it was an open matter. The trial, which took place near his residence, had the trial court rightly punished him, keeping in view the role of each of the accused; however, in sentencing, he had taken some rather harsh views on the victim. In both cases, not all injuries to the witnesses were serious in nature or dangerous to human life. The appellant / accused has been facing trial for more than five years and according to the record, the accused, besides the accused, has already passed a substantial part of his sentence, except for one of the accused. The sentence was reduced to a period he had already committed, while, according to one of the accused, his conviction was imposed under section 230c (c) and 34, PPC to section 382b, CRPC. Ten years in prison with the benefit of top advocate from Gilgit lawyer