Find a Lawyer

NAZAR versus STATE

Section 302 (b) definition of evidence was designated as a complaint to 5 persons and the accused was named as the accused who attracted the prosecution's witnesses, who was shot before the 12 bore gun which The accused was fired by the accused, but there is no seat for any injuries. Whatever the complaint was that there was a clear dispute between the confrontation and medical evidence related to where the accused was shot, the injured lawyer was not charged with any firing. The FIR, however, was introduced during the hearing during the trial and a prosecution witness was charged in connection with the shooting incident. No crime was recovered from the 12 bore gun blank, no firearms recovered at the indications of the accused. Support the prosecutor's case The FIR has no source of light, even though it was filed with a delay of five hours and thirty minutes, but the site plan A showed a lecture bulb like this. There was also a blatant improvement in the section, the identity of the suspect, who fired at the deceased, the ocular account was not confirmed, the report of the firearms expert from the medical evidence was not positive, in which case the suspects' involvement was suspicious. Was to increase the suspect's suspicion, his sentence and sentence was set aside, and he was released law websites from Samma Satta lawyer