GUL SHER versus STATE
The contents of Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324 Bail, FIR revealed that when the accused picked up Lalcara, the complainant raised his arm and requested the accused not to shoot him. He did not hurt or hurt her, but the suspects opened fire with her. 30 bore pistol and pistol pellet were pierced by the complainant's shirt, while the position of his arms was high. Such a first face was also unreliable, if the facts and circumstances stated in the FIR. Went, questioning the non-recourse of the accused, raising the question and forming a suspicious record, saying that the accused did not suffer any injuries and did not repeat the fire. In these circumstances it was not safe to assume that the accused intended to kill the complainant, whether or not the PPC was attracted, considering it by the trial court on the basis of the evidence contained by the parties and As will be seen, the challan was already submitted and the accused was not required for further investigation. The case of the accused fell into the category where further investigation was required to prove the accused's guilt. The accused was admitted on bail, Under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Jaffarabad lawyer