Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAN versus MUHAMMAD KHAN

Article 34 (2) The passing of the order after the date of the pre-discrimination trial, namely, 31 7 1986, the effect taken by the emperor was that in his favor the order was passed by the appellate court in 1993, therefore, The provisions of section 34 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, were applicable in the suits and appeals filed under the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, in which decisions and orders were passed before 1-8 1986, the Punjab Pre-emission Act. The provisions of 5 34 (2) of the Impression Act, 1991 shall apply, in such cases proceedings will be continued and the defense under the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913 before defending the target date. The decree imposed, if no such decree had been passed in favor of the pre-emptor before 1986, would not continue with the cases and appeals under the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, in the present case, 1 8 The case was approved before 1986, and an appeal against such order is pending, which will be covered under the provisions of section 34 (s). 2) The Punjab Pre-Impression ACT, 1991, and if the pre-emption suit was rejected before the target date, the preliminary injunction, though later approved in the appeal, was passed by the Punjab Pre-Emission Act of 1991 This decision could not be rescinded by section 34 (2) and an order for this injunction will be issued immediately. The law was targeted by the Supreme Court in the case, in the case of PLD 1986, as section C360, under the title of Syed Kamal Shah, Government of the NWFP, and as such, this order Was not included under section 34 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act. The 1991 appeal was dismissed list of advocates from Larkana lawyer