BABU MUHAMMAD MUNIR versus S.A. HAMEED
O IV, R 2 & O XXXIII, R 6 Appeal, restoration of the absence of the Advocate, explaining that he was engaged before another bench of the court for any relief not to enter the affidavit through the Advocate Advocate Record. Neither offered a clear explanation or his absence from the Supreme Court, did not divulge the details of the case in which he was engaged before another bench of the Supreme Court upheld the contents of the application for restoration of the appeal on record. The affidavit was recorded. The record remained in place throughout the day, nor did the Supreme Court lawyer retain his affidavit record in support of the grounds for the appeal being restored, and the record of the airline's ticket photostat copying the authenticity of my dismissal order was returned. Will not be enough for Although the appeal record of the appeal of the illegal prosecution, even in the presence of a lawyer who was engaged in litigation, should have appeared in court during the case hearing in Rule 1980 O IV, R 2 of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court denies reinstatement Appeal application dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Ghotki lawyer