Find a Lawyer

DOST MUHAMMAD versus KHAIR MUHAMMAD

A VII, Muslim owner of R 11 property, right to change gift, challenge the scope of O VII's scope, R 11, CPC Object Plaintiff (son) created by plaintiff (father) in favor of defendant. Filed a Gift Property Challenge Declaration. (Son) The Plaintiff claimed that the Defendant's father separated the property in favor of the Defendant's son under influence and exploitation, and the Plaintiff's father previously disposed of the property to the Plaintiff under the same property Oh VI, R 11, CPC. Filed by both the courts below. The plaintiff's father of the statement stated in the statement that he had transferred the property in favor of the plaintiff son of his free will and consent and that the plaintiff's son had not acted under the plaintiff's behalf and that the plaintiff's son had to inspect the father. I had not had the opportunity. The owner, who was given all the rights to dispose of the property during his life, cannot be declared illegal or lawless, O VII, R 11, appealed to the CPC to cancel the trial. So that if the parties consider the plates and materials available on the record, the court finds that this case is plausible and without merit, it would be appropriate to tie it in the bud at an early stage. Was. The petition was rejected by the courts pakistani advocates Khanbel lawyer