Find a Lawyer

NAWAZ KHAN versus SHABRATI

Section 42 In this case, the inheritance was confirmed in favor of the applicants for the actual landowner's data in the dispute, and the defendant's three sons and the deceased respondent's daughter, the son of a deceased, in his case. I challenged the conversion of the inheritance by illegally and falsely alleging that they were the only and only son of the victim and that the petitioner who claims the victim's son and daughter were not the victim's children and He did not have the right to dismiss the case related to the property of the deceased trial court, but the appellate court ruled in the trial court The filing of the appeal against the judgment, keeping the trial court's judgment and order aside and the verdict of the case, the respondent was not brought on the documentary evidence record to prove that the applicant was the child of another person. No credible evidence was presented on the record, to deny the defendant's fact that the applicant did not have the son and daughter of the deceased's original owner on the property, while the applicants positively excluded this responsibility. Made, not only through oral evidence, but also because of the repetitive journal, which also gave the respondents their own statement. He was admitted at the cross and failed to prove that not only was the appellate court ignoring the false documentary evidence by Patwari Syed, but the appellate court's misrepresentation and decree were not upheld. , It was set aside and the trial court's case was retained by the respondents. Discard \ r \ n \ r \ n advocate for immigration from Feroz Watan lawyer