Find a Lawyer

ANWAR versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) and 540 of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337 H (ii), 337 L (ii), 148 and 149 Offenses (Sexual Enforcement) of the Hoodood Ordinance (VII 1979), Sections 10 (4) and II The alleged abductor, as part of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 bail, further inquiry complainant's grant and prosecution witnesses, in their statements before the trial court in Chief Examinations, supported the prosecution's case. But when he was called back for cross-examination, he made various statements and denied that he had denied the statements made in the previous statements in the Examination of the witnesses in the Chief of Examination. And automatically record the trial court did not abuse any other court in the trial court to the alleged abduction procedures. He denied the previous statement, being a good man, who made different statements at different times, his testimony should be taken with caution and caution as to what was the legal effect of the subsequent statement, With which i can go So far after the trial of the full debate after allegations of further investigation against the accused, he was admitted on bail. immigration advocates from Gujrat lawyer