Find a Lawyer

FARZAND ALI versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, GUJRANWALA

Article 145 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal The property judge disputed the immovable property, in the present case, passed a special order to protect the applicant from possession, which he claimed to be exempt. Approved the property was occupied by two rooms. The order against the respondents was in the Seed Order process, when the defendants, not in accordance with either party, requested the summary jurisdiction of the magistrate, without proceeding with the civil court and with the property in violation of the law resolved. Was successful in obtaining an attachment order under which the civil court once applied. The dispute over the possession of immovable property was seized and an interim order regarding possession of such property was passed, with no criminal court section 145, CR PC or section 146, CR PC civil Will not exercise jurisdiction under the Court, being the court of final jurisdiction. Powers were always set up to decide all civil disputes between the parties and precautionary measures. The proceeding before the magistrate was always subject to the decision of the civil court magistrate, the first party, after knowing that Subsequently, the dispute before a competent jurisdiction was a subpoena and should be avoided, it should be done with caution and caution. Alternatively, as a contradictory and contradictory order when there was a lack of jurisdiction in their given circumstances, the best way for a magistrate was to take the dispute into jurisdiction and add to the persecution of the parties. The court lawer from fb area from Digri lawyer