Find a Lawyer

MST. MUBARAK SALMAN versus STATE

Article 31A & 32 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 87, & A & 1 561 A Constitution of Pakistan 197 1973), Arts, Convicted of fugitives without trial and under section 87 and 88, the PC appealed to the court without surrendering, accused of not surrendering due to Val action, lost the right to a hearing Such a hearing could not be held, such appeal could not be sustained as legal evidence as per the conviction of the accused as provided under the law and also absent. In re, there was a violation of the principles of natural justice and Article 9 of the Constitution Court required only the passing of a legal judgment, only the jurisdiction in the trial court was not to provide justice or to maintain it. The unwanted verdict passed in excess of the powers of the trial court could not be remedied because the final trial court had granted a wrong verdict by misuse of the judicial act by any court when it was misused in its process. Correction can be done by itself or by the High Court when the Accountability Court was under Article 203 of the Constitution under the High Court High Court, which had the power to monitor and control it. Subordinate courts revoke an unreasonable decision, while the High Court may, in its sole discretion, exercise constitutional, revision and jurisdiction, set aside the impugned judgment, and as a result, the status quo will be up to date. Was established only after the principles of restoration. property advocate from Shadiwal lawyer