AMANAT ALI versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER WITH POWERS OF COLLECTOR, NAROWAL
Section 54 For non-proprietary owners in the Punjab Jinnah Population Rural Areas Act (III of 6 1986), a permanent suit permanently claims the defendants in the lawsuit for the injunction against the owners of that country. is one of the. The suit in his own right was occupied by the plaintiff, the fact that the plaintiff occupied the suit land was not denied by the defendants, but the defendants merely claimed that they ruled under section 3. Is entitled to occupy the 7 Marla Scheme for non-owned cars issued by them. Jinn r \ n \ r \ nThe Rural Area Act, 1986, together with the Punjab Jinnah population for non-proprietors, rejected the claim that the suit land was filed to the defendants and stated that the Scheme Assistant Commissioner admitted. That the plaintiff was a landlord in the village. For the relevant year, Jamabandi also supported the plaintiff's submission / claim that he was entitled to the land in his own court in Shamlat Deh. Kim had recorded a grievous wrong record and failed to consider the defendant's right to have a particular measles kidney and jambundi for the relevant year; the impugned orders of the courts were, in the circumstances, not sustained and separated. Was made and the plaintiff's case was ordered as a prayer for \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
