ARIF ALI ALIAS MUHAMMAD ARIF versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
The specific performance of the contract to sell to Section 12 respondents was that the appellant's father verbally agreed to sell the suit to him, while the next day, in his written statement by the appellant, A written agreement was therefore refused to be implemented. He said that the contract proved to be valid through the slightest witness and the author of the same respondents also presented the part which went to show the truth of the respondents' testimony, the appellate court examined the evidence on record. And concluded that the appellant had in fact contracted to sell. Respondents' right to reasoning in the Appellate Court below was appropriate and correctly appreciated the evidence on record, the appeal decision was unimaginable and the appellant was unable to disclose the existence of any of the grounds mentioned in Section 100, CPC. That would justify interfering with the appeal decision in the second appeal. Excluded \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
