Find a Lawyer

IN THE MATTER OF: M/S. MACDONALD LAYTON COMPANY LIMITED versus IN THE MATTER OF: M/S. MACDONALD LAYTON COMPANY LIMITED

Failure to comply with the provisions of Sections 233, 237, 472 and 495 Companies Ordinance, 1984 Company and its directors. Action was taken under Companies must, in accordance with the provisions of Section 233 of the Ordinance 1984, present the annual general meeting, audited balance sheet and profit and loss account to its shareholders, and under section 237 of the ordinance, directors were required to be attached. To say that the audited accounts group's consolidated financial statements, such as those submitted by a single enterprise and such consolidated financial statements, should be revised, the Companies Ordinance 1984 failed to comply with the provisions of the law Notice was taken under section 472. Directors of the Company are required to arrange for audit of the books of the Company and the submission of audited / stable accounts within the stipulated period provided that the Company has given the specifications for non-compliance with the provisions of law in response to the notice. The company's business was suspended but the company's business was suspended in 1998 and it was a hassle with regards to its financial position, but it was even more important that the company's shareholders be compensated by the company's condition. Authenticated information was provided, audited annual financial statements as a source of verified information Which were provided information company law the directors have been ordered to comply with mandatory provisions of law and to guide the company in compliance with its directors and companies ordinance 1984, section 49 online advocate from Lala rukh lawyer