Find a Lawyer

MST. HAMEEDA KHATOON versus MUMMAL

In the interest of the defendant for the specific performance of the plaintiff's contract by presenting a minor witness in Article 12 law testimony (ID 1984), Article 79 was proved and further statement was made Although the plaintiff's trial court had died in the interest of other witnesses and the foregoing, it was primarily dismissed on the basis that the plaintiff did not present two minor witnesses as Conan testified, The plaintiffs of 1984 claimed that the agreement could be proved by presenting even one minor witness at the relevant time. Law martyrdom, 1984 was not enforced and Article 79 of the law was required to provide two minor witnesses in Article 79, there was no restriction on the legality of the defendants. This is not guaranteed by law jobs for fresh advocates from Jhang lawyer