Find a Lawyer

IN THE MATTER OF: AAMIR SHEZAD AWAN versus IN THE MATTER OF: AAMIR SHEZAD AWAN

Submission of multiple applications for shares of companies presented to the Public Impact Bank for the sponsorship of a bank offer, by filing a Section 18A mock application or letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission In violation of Section 18A of the Securities and Exchange Ordinance of List, 1969, the corporation (the offer belter) had detected all the applicants in which one applicant had been submitted by a commercial bank and the other alleged. As it was presented by him. Both different banks said that the petitions were submitted under the same name with the same NLC number and the father's name, but with different signatures and addresses, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a showcase notice to one and the same person. Was made, but in response to his written explanation at different address, the applicant stated that he had submitted only one application through a commercial bank and he had no information about the person who had taken the matter. I exchanged other petitions and correspondence, which revealed that two different individuals applied for the same N LC Number and father's name, but the facts with different addresses and signatures made it clear that the request submitted by the applicant through the Commercial Bank was genuine and the offer was advised. Accept the request submitted by the banker through the Commercial Bank and the amount submitted against the fake request should be confiscated accordingly. \ r \ n pakistani advocates Ugoki lawyer