Find a Lawyer

MST. KHURSHIDAN BIBI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 12 (2) of the Law in the absence of the party under the testimony (10 of 1984), Arts 95 and 113 of the Special Relief Act (1 of 1877), Section 42 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Rescue source ()), The CPC was rejected to set aside the order to withdraw the question The question was whether the plaintiff was not legally sued by the courts, the authority to withdraw or settle the case. And there was legality to speculate on such an option, yet such an assumption was always rejected if the party challenged the authority of its lawyer, the party could provide evidence. To prove that the Petitioner specifically claimed that she never authorized her lawyer to withdraw the case. , She failed to prove such a request merely by dismissing such a conception of evidence; she could not justify them through the petitions of the courts under section 12 (2), CPC Could not be en Excluding the parties from giving them the opportunity to present evidence in favor of their own petitions immigration advocate from Killa Abdullah lawyer