PROFESSOR DR. MUHAMMAD USMAN versus PROFESSOR DR. ABDULLAH DAYO
Sections 23 and 25 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Appointment of the Dean of Faculty Petitioner on the Application of Teachers, who was a Professor in the Faculty of the Faculty at the relevant University, sought the appointment of the Respondents Question Not a pharmacist registered under The Pharmacy Act, 1967, did not enable him to be appointed as a Dean Petitioner, who was too young, but had all the qualifications in Pharmacy, joined as a Lecturer, and was eventually promoted as Professor. The respondent did not have or did not have a bachelor's degree in pharmacy. He was able to show that any degree he received was recognized by the Central Council as considered by clause (a) of Section 25 of the Pharmacy Act, 1967, the respondent was not a pharmacist. , Especially when another professor who was officially enrolled in a pharmacist was eligible for appointment to the extent the constitutional petition was allowed to declare the appointment of a response nt with no legal authority \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
