Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB BHATTI versus STATE

Sections 10 (3) and 16 of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), sections 236, 237 and 238 of the evidence accuse the accused of being guilty of a crime and of being guilty of other offenses, of section 10 (3) and 16 of the offense. Was convicted of adultery. (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979 The perpetrators were charged under Section 16 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, and were not charged under section 10 (3) of the said ordinance, but Yet they were punished and punished under them. Both said that although a person has been charged with one offense under Section 237 CCPC, he may be sentenced to another offense but the application of Section 237, CRPC was limited to those cases. The provisions of Sections 236 and 238 fall under the CRPC since the accused were not charged. Under Section 10 (3) of the Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, which was a serious offense in relation to section 16 of the Ordinance and required completely different facts. Under section 10 (3) of the Ordinance, a conviction against an accused can be punished, and it cannot be sustained. The unidentified order was set aside and the trial court remanded to the judge to make a fresh decision in accordance with the law. advocates from Kotli Loharan lawyer