MESSRS NOBLE ENTERPRISES THROUGH MIAN MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN
Arts 3, 18, 25, 30 (2), 38 and 199 in connection with the principles of constitutional submission policy, the notification to assign franchise to currency exchange companies was challenged on the basis that private persons were facilitated. Such a franchise cannot be introduced. Moneychangers' business was a policy matter protected under Article 30 (2) of the Customs Applicant, which was a substantial money laundering, seeking deliberate voting despite its deliberations in formulating a policy. Stayed away and demanded constitutional protection, under the counterfeit cover, the Impugned Policy, which introduced a better control of the foreign exchange business, was already implemented and accepted by 90% of the business people. , Was not open to any concession, even as an organ of authority, the state, the constitutional jurisdiction, There was no proceeding against them under the Act without the merits the High Court dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
