Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ versus STATE

Section 302 (b) was defined as two versions of the case, one was presented by the prosecution and the other by the defense was not serious and suddenly provocative because it did not allege that it had committed its non- Married sister was seen under objectionable circumstance, Article 121 of the 1984 law, when an accused wanted to bring her case under section 300, PPC or section 302 (c), PPC under any exception. If so, then there is a heavy responsibility. In order to prove the same charge, the charge said that the opinion of the police officer is not binding in the court till the investigating officer responds that the accused committed the murder of the deceased due to the encroachment and the sister of both the accused was a court and they Had contracted. Allegations According to the rituals of Islam, not only was one incident of the marriage, but four loaded wounds on the victim's prosecution proved their case against the accused beyond the shadows. The suspicion of maintaining the conviction against the accused was suspected because the witnesses of the incident had no enmity with the accused, although a witness of the prosecution was very close to the deceased ie his real brother but had no enmity or any strong motive. When he was a witness in another case. An independent witness to the case, while another was the victim's second brother, but there was no enmity or reason to dismiss him against the accused. Otherwise, the accused himself confessed to the incident, through trial. An appropriate verdict was not sought to convict the accused. The trial court's interference in the jurisdiction of the appeal was earlier famous high court advocate from Attock lawyer