Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

A. XXXVII, the receipt of a Swiss 2 and 3 case for receipt of money on the basis of the promise clause was formally proved by the witnesses in receipt of the promise note in question, including the thumb mark and the signature of the official. Were. After the promise was proved on the record as stated on the reverse side of the pact, as well as on the opposite side, it was for the defendant to bring evidence to establish a forgery of signature and thumb impression on the document in this regard. Was not done Defendants either examine and select documents by an expert, or by the trial court themselves, to record the material on the material for such question comparison and evaluation, Extensive scrutiny by the defendant does not constitute a question to prove the defendant's right. In the absence of any evidence of alleged fraud on record on the basis of the payment of the debt along with the promissory note pro note, the trial court rightly dismissed the defendant's charge in his evidence. Was rejected, the trial court did not find any weakness or illegal motion in the judgment, against which the appellant stated that the decision was dismissed \ r \ n power of attorney advocate Mirpur (AJK) lawyer