ABDUL MAJEED versus STATE
Sections 302 (b), 395 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (4) Code of Criminal Procedure (V9) 1898), section 7474 ??? The testimony of the prosecution was restored to the ocular account presented by the complainant and other prosecution witnesses who were, at the time of the incident, with the subpoena. Receiving Kalashnikov's capture from the scene of the incident and identifying the suspect through the firearms expert's positive report and witnesses on the occasion of the parade was a long day and there was ample time for witnesses to identify the suspect. Was recognizable. The power of Magistrate Third Class witnesses has long been under the supervision of the detainee's detainee, but no contradiction was made on the record for damage to the identity parade's identity value; nothing was on record to show that That the witnesses have any enmity with the accused or an unlawful will. He was examined to prove that the accused had correctly identified the accused and that he had no reason to falsely accuse the accused of making false allegations, the evidence presented by the witnesses was straightforward, natural and competent. There was confidence, his testimony remained inconsistent in the open examination, and there was no material contradiction and improvement. The NTF delayed the loss of the FIR termination case, which was not otherwise described, was neither fatal nor had a negative effect on the actual account collusion or prosecution in the case. The possibility of creating a false story was excluded, the witness who was interested in the situation was the one who intended it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Faisalabad lawyer