Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN ABDUL AZIZ versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY LAND UTILIZATION DEPARTMENT

Section 4 (2) Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Termination of Section 42 Allotment cancellation of allotment loss to the Government Under section 4 (2) of the Sindh city state, the plaintiff's offer to deposit money Despite the approval of the Chief Minister's scope. Allotment, Conversion and Exchange) Ordinance 2000 Canceled, its allotment was canceled Only by the declaration of the Sindh Urban State Land (Allotment, Conversion and Exchange) Ordinance 2000, the plaintiff cannot lose his right and interest in the property plaintiff. Was. Under the Sindh Urban State Land (Allotment, Conversion and Conversion Cancellation) Ordinance, 2000, the Chief Minister had the right to receive ownership rights and title after payment of various amounts by the Government under the provisions. The Sindh Urban State Land (Allotment, Conversion and Cancellation of Orders) Ordinance, 2000 had no role and did not require approval or consent. Invoice should not be issued, except for summary approval from the Chief Minister. The approval or consent of the Minister was unlawful and without jurisdiction and the authority of the Sindh Civil State Land (Allotment, Conversion and Conversion Cancellation) Ordinance 2000 was directed to invoice the plaintiff in respect of the suit land. Release In the circumstances the suit was ordered best law firms from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer