RAUF TEXTILE AND PRINTING MILLS EMPLOYEES\' UNION versus MESSRS RAUF TEXTILE AND PRINTING MILLS (PVT.) LTD.
Section 22A (8) (g) National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) by Applicants, Employees unfair labor practice / union charged with four employees. Applications were filed against him in which he was charged. That the administration has committed numerous acts of unfair labor practices to make their union terminated and ineffective, and the applicants have violated various laws which the administration was angry with and which they To take disciplinary action against. The cause notice issued to the four employees showed that they had refused to comply with the deadline set by the management if the administration had any illicit desire or resentment against the applicant union. There should have been action against the officials, not their officials nor the union management, nor any wrongdoing, nor any wrongdoing of any kind of allegations in the snowy conditions. Because of this, unfair labor practice will not proceed with the application filed against the administration There was a hearing, the applicant due to changes in the application conditions were not entitled to any injunction rejected \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Sukkur lawyer