Find a Lawyer

IN THE MATTER OF: M/S. QUICE FOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED versus IN THE MATTER OF: M/S. QUICE FOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Failure to hold Sections 158, 170, 233, 234, 472 and 495 Annual General Meeting and failure to submit quarterly accounts Directs the Company to revoke other defects and irregularities held at the Annual General Meeting Failed to do The Company's track record for submitting audit accounts and conducting annual general meetings was not satisfactory under Section 158 (1) and 233 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, nor did it create audit accounts related to the financial year. Went to According to the requirements of section 234 of the Companies Ordinance 1984 and it did not present an accurate and fair picture of the status of the company's affairs under section 4772 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984. The company needs to make good on-going errors by removing auditors. In qualifying and submitting the audited annual accounts for the relevant years, the company was also advised to prepare the accounts so that they could give a correct and fair view of the affairs of the company. In addition, a separate action was initiated under Sections 158, 170 and 245 of the Companies Ordinance 1984, protection of the investors / shareholders against the companies was an important objective of the Company Ordinance, 1984, as investors / shareholders. Provided the badge for capital formation. Individuals have no direct control over the company, except that they select directors for a three-year term and hand over the affairs of the company to the hope that they will run the company wisely to protect their interests. ? It was demanded in Sections 233, 234 and 245 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 that jobs for advocates from Umer Kot lawyer