Find a Lawyer

INAYATULLAH AND OTHERS versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL

Arts 4, 25 and 212 (3) Notification No F 3 12/96 SA (FDF) A III, History, 49 2000 Reorganization of General Cadre Reasonable Classification of Four-Level Composition Scheme, Directors Physical Education (DPE) ) And the Principles of Physical Training Instructors (PTI) claim that they were discriminated against by not including `` The General Cadre / Judiciary General Cadre of the school teachers, who stood on 11, 1999 , Was added. The four-tier structure scheme includes upgrades and re-designation of the general cadre of school teachers with no cadre affiliation or cadre with members of the PTI and other staff members who claim to have DPs. Has been discriminated against, DPES and PTLs, there was no denying anything. It can be legitimately claimed that notification number F 3 12/96 SA (FDE) A III, dated 49/2000, is against the letter and spirit of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in the case of Ahmed Hussein. ? Me and others vs. Director Education Islamabad and others reported 2001 SCMR 955 status. As per the special class decisions regarding the entire class and category of the school teachers of the Physical Education Cadre of Islamabad / Federal Area, which is a notification of Federal Government Notification No. F3 12/96 SA (FDE) A III, 49 2000 , Did not disrespect the Article 25 Articles read with Article 4 of the Constitution and was not prejudiced ever since he started becoming a member of the Physical Education Department staff of the Federal Government, Islamabad / Federal Area. Has happened and since then it has been treated as a separate group. Overall, never included in the usual cadre of teachers famous high court advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer