PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EXCISE AND TAXATION AND OTHERS versus MESSRS AZAD WINE SHOP
R10 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 21 and 31 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application before the High Court Scope regarding the collection of appropriate alternative treatment and collection of vendor fees, review The fee prohibition (Head of Enforcement) Order, 1979, and the surcharge on Touchstone were the question of Rule 10, the Sindh Prohibition Rules, 1979 gave the government or its authorized officers the power to demand and examine the records. Adopted or passed by any authority, so as to convince itself that the legal status or ownership of the same directing power of the Government cannot be called an alternative remedy where the law shall be ratified. Or rules or guidelines that governed the law, the availability of alternative remedies was never acted upon by the High Court as a constitutional jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Sehar Baqlas lawyer