Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN KALUS versus PUNJAB LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOARD

R4 dismissal of Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 44 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance (XIII of 2001), Section 196 (ii) of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 of the service of the Local Council. Dismiss appeal by tribunal The court allowed the appeal to consider the question of whether the service tribunal exercised its jurisdiction under section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974, ignoring the provisions of section 44 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979. Could be denied, under which local members of council services were given the status of civil servants so they could approach the service tribunal to resolve their complaints. What will be the import, effect and effect of the cancellation of Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979, Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001, which was not given previous effect. If the Service Rules framed under the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979 were protected under the provisions of 5 196 (ii) of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001 and if the answer was in force, what would be the effect? Whether the date of commencement of the disciplinary proceedings against the applicant will be material or that date, ie, the year 2009, when the proceedings were finalized and the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 2001 was operative and whether the law laid down in PIA Corporation v. Pak. According to this it was an inappropriate decision. Safe Dry Cleaners PLD 1981 SC 553 and Adnan Afzal vs. Sher Afzal PLD 1969 SC 187 top advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer