Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MATLOOB versus STATE

Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Interim Order, relied on the receipt acknowledging the payment of the checks to the defendant in the presence of a valid agreement The plaintiff's acknowledgment that the receipt was There is a valid agreement because it was signed by the defendants and this receipt shows that the money was paid in respect of the sale of the suit property raised by the defendants that the checks were not withdrawn and The proposals were subject to maturity provided that only the check would be enclosed upon reaching the sale agreement. The fact is that at the time of the acquisition, the parties were not willing to sell the property, but later wanted to sign an agreement but there was no binding agreement between the parties. The present plaintiff, therefore, failed to establish the first case in his favor for approval of the injunction or did not depend on the fact that the parties were of one mind and all the material terms between them were finalized. It was his intention that the matter was closed and it was concluded that the High Court rejected the interim order and the application was dismissed. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Lalamusa lawyer