Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Sections 561A, 190 and 173 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), sections 447, 511 and 506/34 of the order as it does not indicate that the magistrate has not considered the material submitted during the investigation. There is no reason to disagree with the inquiry officer's opinion on the direction of the Investigation Officer to present the invoice by the magistrate. The law was not required if the investigating officer had not submitted a report on the pro-prescribed form by the government, so that the magistrate would enjoy it and submit a report on such pro forma before the decree was passed. It could say, however, that the filing of the instruction on its own will not affect the legal status of further proceedings even if the administrative order is found to be arbitrary, it may be removed by the High Court. Determining its hereditary jurisdiction under Section 616161A, as a result of the PC's unanticipated order, the magistrate was directed to consider the report submitted by the Investigation Officer after considering the same matter as per law. Pass the order immigration advocates from Timergara lawyer