Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS BABAR versus MESSRS PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL, KARACHI

Section 49 (4) (e) application of unfair wages by employees petitioned the applicants that they were acting as front office cashiers at the hotel, but the employer, through his circular, received the receptionist / front office. The cashier's job and the petitioners were designated as "officers" with the intention that the applicants would cease to be laborers and thereby cease their trade union activities, the petitioners alleged. Become a new officer and quit being a new officer and lose many facilities and privileges. The petitioners had prayed that the circular be declared as an unfair practice of employers and that it should be prevented from affecting the circular aspect of the employer which stated that the circular was issued as a uniform policy. ? Other hotels owned by the employer were successfully implemented, in the circumstances it cannot be said that the circular was a discriminatory act of the employer which was intended to target the applicants only as the applicants alleged and if they Front-office cashiers at other hotels in the US have said that the organizers had no good reason to challenge them on the basis of unfair labor by employees. The applicants did not disagree with the fact that such a system is operating all over the world. The applicant was not an official of any trade union, but he was only an active member of the trade union. There was no status of losing trade. us immigration advocates from Chitral lawyer