MAPLE LEAF CEMENT FACTORY LTD. THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER versus WARYAM
In reference to the XX Land Acquisition Act (of 1894), sections 18 and 54 on the ground reference to the non-advertisement by the referee court, the decision was required to record the directive. was done. The AX, CPC judge, in the present case, was not in accordance with the provisions of the law as the evidence in this case was to be based on evidence and no other substance or element was to be taken into consideration by the referee court, while a Was recorded by detecting on. The problem was clearly found that the landlord failed to produce any evidence, but nonetheless, relief was given by increasing the compensation, which was described as a relief on the actions taken on these matters. Should have followed and been consistent with these results but it was so. In the present case, it is not that such a case could not in fact be able to come to a decision in the law and it was bound to be kept in court. The High Court remanded the case for judgment by the Ian of Referee Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
