Find a Lawyer

CHIEF MANAGER OF PLANNING AND INSTALLATION, TELEPHONE INDUSTRIES OF PAKISTAN,ISLAMABAD versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM

Sections 15, 22A (8) (G) and 22D Service Period Appeal Employer Employees accused of practicing unfair labor by Section 22A (8) (G) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance Filed before the National Industrial Relations Commission, 1969, with a prayer that they be reinstated. That they should be declared permanent employees and that their dismissal by the employer was unlawful and that an unfair labor practice was employed by the employees on a contractual basis for a limited period of employment and that each There was a gap of about three and a half years after the contract was employed, which would mean that there was no continuity of service to the employees, in the circumstances neither the permanent staff nor the employees had to fulfill their responsibilities. had been. The letters of appointment also revealed that the employees were being hired on a purely contractual basis and that the facilities available to the permanent were not being extended to the employees, the employees were, in the circumstances, treated as regular or regular employees. The hiring orders of employees could not be disclosed that they were not working in the same positions, but they were being deployed to places where some work was to be done. Being started and being done at different locations, employees, under the circumstances, cannot be asked to work in the same positions for a permanent period so that employees can terminate the service contract at any time. Qualified and it was not necessary that a written order should be issued for the termination of employees at the expiration of the contract. inheritance advocates near Miran Shah lawyer