Find a Lawyer

JAFFAR ALL ALVI versus STATE

Before the arrest of Section 498 Exploration Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F, the accused and the complainant were business partners, but subsequently the investigating officer himself testified before the Sessions Judge on the FIR subject matter concerning accounts. There was no identifiable crime. In its jurisdiction, the civil court was also on record in the order of the United Arab Emirates (foreign), in which the record indicating the existence of a dispute between the two parties also showed that the accused was a businessman and had no criminal record. That is, before the arrest, the purpose of the bail law was to protect the liberty and reputation of the citizens, especially in cases when circumstances and facts were filled with suspicion, always giving the accused the benefit of the doubt. When it creates a dispute over the issue of accounts based on the abolition of independence and this adds to the wealth of wealth. The High Court allowed the application and interim bail grant, so the decision could not be ruled out even under the circumstances. Delegation of the accused is subject to the supply of fresh bail bonds with two guarantees in the amount of Rs 2 lakh. As is the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar of the High Court. immigration advocates email from Khushal Kot lawyer