MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus MST. ZAINAB BIBI
Under the Lim42 Limitation Act (IX of 8 1908), Article-120 suit for sale mutation in relation to the plaintiff's land was alleged that he was a forgery and the result of impersonation was in the year 7 filed year in The plaintiff's petition and the change of evidence were filed to challenge. The effect was that he was found to have alleged fraud in filing a lawsuit 21 months ago, when the defendant stopped playing his part of the production, on record by the plaintiff on such a stand. There was no denying, except that the defendant's mere self-serving statement was not enough to misrepresent the implications arising from the evidence, there was no time limit for challenging such a transaction. The secret to filing a litigation suit will only begin from the date of the original risk when the defendant was considered by the defendant. The 21 had been refused the title. The suit was within months before filing suit. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Chaininda lawyer
