Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB versus SHAKEEL AHMAD

RR 2 (1) (c) and 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) imposed a prohibition on preventing increments by an officer authorized by a public servant to impose penalties against a public servant on charges of financial misconduct. Gone. Authorized officer fined four increments but the provincial secretary directed De Novo inquiry, without specifying the previous penalty, the government employee was removed from service, the service tribunal appealed on the basis that the authority Punjab Civil The Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules cannot review the order of an officer authorized under R2 (1) (c) of 1975, while instructing the provincial secretary de novo inquiry, the servant did not act as a provincial government. Even if there could be any doubt, the Supreme Court extended its profit to the company by allowing a public servant to do public work. Instead, it was fined authorized officer, the authority can not be said to be not a DOE employee in the presence of nine against the government did not impose a more severe penalty than fines and suspended. Supreme Court denies interference in service tribunal's decision to grant leave to appeal patent advocate from Mandra lawyer