INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MIAN ASIM FAREED
Section 7 (4) of the Contempt of the Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 379, 406 and 420 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 FIR repealed and in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, on the taking of the discrimination injunction High Court, The FIR was revoked on the basis that it was registered in violation of the provisions of Section 7 (4) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001. Validation Number: The order to terminate the FIR can neither be approved nor granted that the offenses mentioned in the FIR were false and malicious, and could not be found if a particular forum Or in the mood to confess to a crime, the prohibition on registering an FIR was also recorded. Under criminal law, the confession of cases was two separate and independent concepts if the lawmaker intended. It was said that if there was any restriction on the registration of the FIR, the legislature would legislate, especially if the law was only serious But it can never be read to restrict FI registration. The High Court did not pass a legal and valid order, in which the Supreme Court changed the application for leave to appeal. The appeal and the order passed by the High Court of Appeal were set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Gari Habibullah lawyer