Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZ1Z versus MESSRS FEROZSONS LABORATORIES LTD.

SS, 46 and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) (i). Was done He was dismissed by the employees after an inquiry by the employees against the order of his dismissal, the Labor Court dismissed him, however, he was dismissed from his job. Dismissed from employment, the appellant had earlier filed an appeal against the order of the Labor Court High Court Appellant and its representative participated in the inquiry proceedings, examined the evidence presented by the employer and the appellant filed his The defense had examined five witnesses, the matter was thoroughly investigated and the appellant was given his duty. Was found guilty of negligence in performing the act, the law did not provide for the copy. Workers were removed from employment upon completion of the inquiry report / action appellant Prior to this, the appellant had committed similar misconduct for which he had been warned, but he had to improve his methods. Could not be made due to which the charge was properly presented to the appellant in a fixed period which was random. Approved by an authorized competent officer after fulfilling all the formal requirements, the appellate jurisdiction did not demand interference by the High Court tax advocates from Chak Sawara lawyer