Find a Lawyer

ILYAS CHAUDHRY versus INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPERS CORPORATION (PVT.) LIMITED KARACHI

Sections 11, 12, 13 (4) and 16 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002), for the establishment of the Section 62 Pay Salary Board Award Petitions, failed to enforce the Sato Wage Board Award, which became effective from July 2000. had gone. The application was filed under Section 16A of the Newspaper Employees (Terms of Service) Act 1973 and Section 62 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, stating that the award Said Award, which reached the deadline, was binding on all newspapers. And they were under legal obligation. To apply the award to the Labor Court of his letter and spirit under Section 62 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, the employer shall be entitled to the arrears of land revenue under the land or the employer under the provisions of section 13 (4) under public demand. Was able to recover all the money from. In the Newspaper Employee (Terms of Service) Act, 1973, the Tribunal was authorized to issue a directive that a labor court accepted the application for the enforcement of the award in the Ordinance, 2002, under section 62 of the Industrial Relations. It is said that collection of dues will be received from the Establishment as arrears of land revenue and payment will also be made to the concerned applicants. tax advocates from Tando Allahyar lawyer