Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 1322 AND 1323(IB) OF 2004, DECIDED ON 15TH JUNE, 2005. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 1322 AND 1323(IB) OF 2004, DECIDED ON 15TH JUNE, 2005.

The filing of returns under Sections 59, 62 and 134 Self Assessment Scheme for Appellate Tribunal Return Appeal was not accepted under the Self Assessment Scheme for two years due to the fact that the declared income was last checked. Income Commissioner is less than Income Tax (Appeal) On appeal, the Assassing Officer directed that he accept the proclaimed version of the Assisi Department, before which the Appellate Tribunal Assisi stated that the status of the Assisi Company was registered during the period under consideration. Was changed from to a people's association. Earlier, the firm was comprised of three partners, while the current members' association had two members, one of whom was a partner at a former firm that was successful in business, and was not overweight because in two years. The case of the registered firm of the proceedings under appeal was filed by the same diagnostic officer on the basis of dissolution of process and HH etc. The capital of the new business was lower than the registered firm in the association of individuals and one of the association members was a partner in the registered firm, while the other was rejected because of a newly announced version of the association for two years. It was announced that the revenue was lower than the previous assessed income, which was unwarranted as it was inconsistent with the firm's case. The Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) case of being an association of persons, in the circumstances, instructed the Assigning Officer to accept the return of self. For many years the department's appeals under the Self Assessment Scheme were rejected, in the circumstances. \ n top advocates from Sakrand lawyer