Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus MST. FARIDA SALEEM

Articles 151 and 152 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Articles 39, 42 and 54 of the suit, the cancellation of the permanent order and the gift process, the suit, the decision and the request for the modification of the order, the plaintiff and the defendant Was excluded with the consent of. Terms between others that are the sole and exclusive property of the Respondent's appropriate property and that the defendant will not be separated, transferred and / or admitted or will not incur any charge during his life. On their behalf the parties requested removal. Due to the unanimous agreement of the defendants, the transfer etc., and demanded that the defendants be allowed to sell the suit property. The court passed a decree on the agreement of the parties under which the parties have the freedom to amend or amend it. With the mutual consent, the Holiness was attached to a court-approved decree and the CPC provisions were provided for a situation where an injunction ends or will be amended or even more frequently. Put aside, for example on review, revision, appeal, section 12 (2), on request under CPC or under section 152, under CVC when it was recognized that the defendant was a The sole and exclusive owner of the property, his father-in-law has the right to deal with it in any way appropriate, doing so, under the decree of consent, Was entitled to be transferred, transferred, ambushed or owned by G, cannot be justified by the respondent bar in the online advocate from Babri Banda lawyer