MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE
Sections 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 221, 222, 223, 225 (iii) and 225A bail, guard duty under prisoners under treatment at prison ward of the defendant's Grant Hospital for being a police constable Were on The accused was the accused prisoner escaped due to his negligence, the accused was tried under the pre-fix offense under Section 2 fell23, PPC but there was not enough evidence to prove that the accused. Had deliberately allowed the prisoner to escape, but had also deliberately committed a crime. The escape was allowed under Section 221, PPC, which was also a guaranteed offense under Section 225A, PPC which is a resident of cases not covered under Sections 221, 222 and 223, PPC. Section was, the trial court only rejected the bail plea of the accused. The police then applied Section 225 (iii), PPC, but said that the accused had no application in this section as the case is related to application matters. Nationally offered to stay or obstruct arresting criminals or detaining them, but no such charge was registered against the accused court, especially in cases of enforcement of the appropriate section of the law. Was not bound by
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Shankiari lawyer