MAZHAR IQBAL versus STATE
Section 498 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F bail prior to arrest, business dealings grant was present between the accused and the complainant and it was stated that the investigation of the matter was entrusted to the complainant. Already payment was made over time and stated that the check was not to be presented to the bank for disclosure, to attract Section 489F, PPC, showing an element of dishonesty, in the present case who This element was absent because the complainant had already been paid the dishonesty of the check will not mean that the criminal The case should be filed, but it should also be kept in mind before the criminal proceedings can be initiated for the purpose for which the check was issued, in which case he has presented a case of further investigation of his crime with which The accused was indicted. Sentenced to only three years \ R1, it would not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497, in cases such as PC grants, bailouts, a rule, and an exception to the pre-arrest bail that the accused had already approved. Had already been confirmed in the circumstances .. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Kamalia lawyer