MRS. SAADIA MUZAFFAR THROUGH HER ATTRONEY versus MRS. KHADIJA MANZUR
Plaintiff denies the common status of the plaintiff for the title to the property acquired by way of gift in equity shares pursuant to Section 2 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), AKX, R18 Suite. Before the gift, the donor had built two identical units in the area. , One of them encountered the main road, while the other had only access to the main road. And this donor gave the defendant a gift to the defendant, the unit facing the main road, and the donor gave the gift, in which the two parties transferred the property together with the house completely built as a unit. Was demonstrated, but not recorded in the residential society section, showing the gift of property to both parties, on the contrary, the defendant's oral evidence could not, therefore, exclude such admitted documentary evidence. Allowing both parties to take possession of a unit property by virtue of a dead donor portion of the property Does not negate the defect. The plaintiff or defendant will have only a case of convenience or convenience, which had nothing to do with the original gift and could never be divided into mats and ceilings before the regular distribution of the property. Had happened The parties affected by the parties or their proposals will be interested in each and every part of being a co-partner and partner in the property. In assessing Nazir's property, the two parts of the value equal to the next part of the property. In re-reporting, the interests of both parties can be well protected so that
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
