Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD MUDASSAR

The age of the Section 7 suspect, commitment to leave school and birth certificate revealed the suspect's age at the time of the incident was about sixteen years, but according to the Medical Board report he was 21/22 years medical board, which The suspect was examined. , Had further made it clear that the exact age of the accused could not be given to the accused, who was involved in 4/5 other criminal offenses, did not seek the minority if the medical board's opinion given by five doctors. In view of this, the whole point, from six months to one year, can be noted from both sides, and even if this difference is taken into account, the age of the accused at the time of the incident is still eighteen. The date of the incident was 29 to 2003 and the Medical Board gave its opinion on 9 th 2005, declaring the accused 21/22 years old if the medical examination If interfered with the date of their death and the proximity of one and a half years, plus one possible difference of one year was calculated, then the age of the accused was more than eighteen years and was important in all intents and purposes. The trial was set aside under the trial trial and the accused was declared important under the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance. , 2000 and was to be tried by a common court along with other ordinary defendants best law firms from Upper Dir lawyer