Find a Lawyer

MST. SABIHA versus STATE

Section 9 (c) definition of evidence. The prosecution's witnesses presented evidence to prove the facts of the arrest of the accused and the recovery of the prohibited charisma from his possession, he found no reason to examine the witnesses' statements and a lengthy investigation. In this case, the accused had failed to make any inadvertent molestation or guilt by the police in the case of the deceased accused because the prosecution witnesses in this case were very consistent, consistent and successfully Had faced cross-examination testing. The defense could not break the testimony of the prosecution's witnesses, nor could anyone abort the unlawful intent, which could have led to the accusation of lying against the accused. The fact that the witnesses belong to the police department itself, cannot be considered a good place to reject their statements. The suspects indicated were trivial, and could not be considered sufficient to have taken any of the convictions taken by the accused to make the case unsuccessful or to suspect recovery, and it appeared that his skin In order to save it, it was determined that the samples of the drug sent to the Chemical Examiner's Office were intact and the analyst's report was received. Positive, which supported the prosecution's story as well as drug recovery, the prosecution in the case successfully took the suspect home without any doubt and the defense had no material contradictions. Or had failed miserably to resolve the conflict. The statements of the prosecution witnesses did not appear as their own testimony required under section 340 (2); patent advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer