Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MALIK ASHRAF AWAN versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB


Section 11 EEE Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance 7 of 1972), Section 3 Intra Court of Appeal appellant was arrested on this basis under Section 11 EEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 In which he was a member of a devout organization and involved. The constitutional petition against the arrest of the appellant was dismissed by the appellant, who dismissed the public activities, the restoration of public order, the threat to sectarian peace and harmony in the country, and the criminal activities for the security and security of the country. Was invalid / member. The banned organization, which represented the secretary government, administered the oath that he had resigned from the membership of the defamatory organization and that criminal activities were also being pursued by the appellant to support the government's policies in dealing with terrorist organizations. I was accused of being involved. , But the prosecution could not show the record of the appellant's alleged criminal activities Failure to apply to the organization All criminal cases were filed against the appellant except in 1996, the appellant's detention of 1998, in the circumstances banned / extremist organization There was no nexus with the criminal cases mentioned in the list of activities of intelligence agencies not announced as the appellant. Unanimously, none of the activists in the list (Prohibited Organization) appellant has been convicted of naming the applicant in the schedule under Section 11EEE of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, without any basis and substance. Authorities against the Appellant were not upheld in the law, the Interdict allowed appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Khandabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.