BAHADUR KHAN versus MUHAMMAD AZAM
No supplementary challan is presented under PPC under Sections 212 and 120B / 34 under Sections 212 and 120B / 34, Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), 5 190 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). has been. In the murder case against the respondents, to identify the criminal conspiracy of the victim's murder and to provide asylum to the accused, the challan was subsequently presented directly to the trial court after a gap of five years from the date of the High Court's criminal decision. Second challan for hearing of cases under Sections 1212 and 120B / 34, preference against appeal of the trial court against the decision of trial court under cases 212 and 120 B / 34 under PPC, appeal, criminal appeal. And the lawsuit was filed on a criminal review request. Before that, but he directly examined the crime, which was not justified in the sense of CR 1905, and the accused proceeded with the trial and the trial of the case after the penalty. 1212, sentenced under PPC and after considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the relevant law related to the subject, the High Court acquitted the accused in the charge, who sentenced the accused. Was rightly separated. And the criminal revision and criminal appeal against the other accused's fate were dismissed, thus, the release of the unsolicited concept for appeal was denied to the complainant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Astore lawyer