GHULAM HUSSAIN versus KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD IQBAL
Article 42 Ordinance of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction (VI of 1959), Section 13 (2) (i) Convention of Convention (10 of 1984), Arts 113 and 87 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XX, R 5 Property The Transfer Act (IV 1882), section 111 (g), exempted the declaration of a wage suit for default removal in the payment of rent while the proprietary proof of a tenant for eviction It was declared that his father was the owner of the dispute. The shops were contradicted and denied with such documentary evidence as the tenants themselves who developed and relied on changes, mobilization and measles gridview. The permanent transfer process and mutation in favor of the landlord were entered into by the tenant during their statement and such admitted facts do not require any proof. Testimony of the witnesses Section 3113 of Law ??un of 1984 Section 1984 Q established that the shops in question were constructed by the landlord at the same time and had a common lintel / roof and that the tenant Was involved. As a tenant in Advance Shops, the landlord brought copies of the original record through Patwari, though it has a lot of cuttings and more articles were signed by the competent authority, so they did not doubt the record. The advertising possession was not proven and the claim of ownership through a prescription on this decree could not be declared as a violation of the orders of Islam.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Kumbh lawyer