Find a Lawyer

MUBEEN ALIAS HAJI MUHAMMAD MUBEEN versus STATE

Section 302 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Articles 221, 222 and 367 Definition of Proof In the present case the defect in the charge was not properly stated and it was misleading in addition to the lack of material details. The defect of the case certainly delayed the trial. And this led to a misunderstanding of justice that resulted in the plaintiff's failure to file any of the three decisions in violation of the provisions of Section 367, allowing the CCPC appeal to the extent that the unclean verdict was granted Was set aside and the trial for the de novo trial was subsequently set before the trial court. While making a new charge that contained the contents of the entire content of the crime committed to comply with the provisions of Section 222, the CC accused was in jail continuously as his arrest proceedings remanded by a trial court Was gone and for no reason. The trial on the error committed by the accused may take a long time, the accused was ordered to be released on bail. famous high court advocate from Ghuzdar lawyer